STRONG POINTS
The presence of a natural and cultural patrimony having a special value
The presence of administrative and institutional structures which are opened to collaborate and to initiate some activities of efficient promotion of the zone (Murighiol Local Council)
The preservation, from the architectonic point of view, of the planimetry and of other traditional elements
The opening of the population from the zone to support the tourism in all its forms
The initiation of some investments for the tourism infrastructure development (presently, the offer is generous)
WEAK POINTS
The development of the touristic infrastructure without the involvement of the local community
The accented degradation of the access infrastructure, fact which lead to the hard access of the tourists
The absence of the financial resources for the sustaining by the local authorities of some big infrastructure projects which could encourage the touristic development of the region
The low economic power of the inhabitants and the absence of the interest in supporting the cultural act
The absence of brochures/folders for the popularization of the region and its exceptional values
The absence of a Center for Touristic Information at the local level
The development only of the mass’ tourism, centered on entertaining activities and on the visiting of the Danube Delta
The presence of a natural and cultural patrimony having a special value
The presence of administrative and institutional structures which are opened to collaborate and to initiate some activities of efficient promotion of the zone (Murighiol Local Council)
The preservation, from the architectonic point of view, of the planimetry and of other traditional elements
The opening of the population from the zone to support the tourism in all its forms
The initiation of some investments for the tourism infrastructure development (presently, the offer is generous)
WEAK POINTS
The development of the touristic infrastructure without the involvement of the local community
The accented degradation of the access infrastructure, fact which lead to the hard access of the tourists
The absence of the financial resources for the sustaining by the local authorities of some big infrastructure projects which could encourage the touristic development of the region
The low economic power of the inhabitants and the absence of the interest in supporting the cultural act
The absence of brochures/folders for the popularization of the region and its exceptional values
The absence of a Center for Touristic Information at the local level
The development only of the mass’ tourism, centered on entertaining activities and on the visiting of the Danube Delta